Decision-making in the early ecumenical councils
How were decisions made in the early ecumenical councils of the Christian Church
In the early ecumenical councils of the Christian Church, decisions were typically made through a combination of theological debate, discussion, and consensus-building among bishops and other church leaders who attended the councils. These councils were convened to address significant theological, doctrinal, and ecclesiastical issues facing the early Christian Church.
Here is a general overview of how decisions were made in the earliest councils:
Call to Council
A council was typically convened by a ruling emperor (in the case of the first seven ecumenical councils) or by the authority of the Church itself. The purpose of the council was to address a specific theological or doctrinal controversy that had arisen within the Church.
Attendance
Bishops, clergy, theologians, and sometimes lay representatives from various regions and dioceses of the Christian world were invited to attend the council. The number of attendees varied from council to council.
Presiding Officer
A presiding officer, often referred to as the council president or patriarch, was chosen to lead the proceedings. The choice of the presiding officer could vary depending on the council’s circumstances.
Debate and Discussion
The main business of the council involved theological debate and discussion of the issues at hand. Bishops and theologians presented their arguments, and these discussions could be vigorous and prolonged.
Examination of Theological Positions
Council participants examined the theological positions put forward by various parties involved in the controversy. This often involved reviewing Scripture, church tradition, and the writings of Church Fathers to determine the orthodoxy and legitimacy of the positions.
Voting and Consensus
Decisions were typically reached through a process of voting or consensus-building. In some councils, a simple majority vote sufficed, while in others, a higher degree of consensus was sought, often requiring the agreement of the majority of bishops present. The exact rules for decision-making varied from council to council.
Formulation of Creeds and Canons
One of the important outcomes of these early councils was the formulation of creeds, such as the Nicene Creed, and the establishment of canons (church laws and regulations) that addressed the theological issues under consideration.
Papal Approval
In some cases, the approval of the Bishop of Rome (the Pope) was sought and considered crucial for the acceptance of a council’s decisions, especially in the Western Church.
Ratification and Enforcement
Once decisions were reached and formalized, they were ratified and enforced within the Christian Church. Noncompliance with the decisions of an ecumenical council could result in excommunication.
It’s important to note that the process and authority of these early ecumenical councils were not always uniformly recognized across all Christian regions, and theological controversies often persisted even after council decisions were made. Additionally, the councils played a significant role in shaping Christian doctrine and orthodoxy, and their decisions continue to influence Christian theology to this day.
Read more: The 21 ecumenical councils
How exactly is authority seen in Eastern Orthodox Churches
In the Eastern Orthodox Churches, authority is structured and understood in a way that reflects a hierarchical and conciliar model of governance. This model has evolved over centuries and is characterized by several key elements:
Conciliarity (Sobornost)
Conciliarity is a central principle in Eastern Orthodoxy, emphasizing that decisions within the Church are made collectively by councils of bishops, clergy, and sometimes laity. Major theological and administrative matters are often resolved through councils, preserving a sense of consensus and unity.
Hierarchy of Bishops
The highest authority in each local Orthodox Church is the bishop, who is also known as a metropolitan, archbishop, or patriarch, depending on the specific jurisdiction. Bishops are seen as the successors to the apostles and hold the fullness of the priesthood. Each bishop governs a diocese or eparchy.
Patriarchs and Autocephalous Churches
Some Orthodox Churches have recognized patriarchs who hold a position of honor and leadership within their regional jurisdiction. Patriarchs are usually the primates of autocephalous (self-governing) Orthodox Churches, such as the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, the Patriarchate of Moscow, or the Patriarchate of Alexandria.
Synods and Councils
Decisions within the Orthodox Church are often made by synods or councils, which bring together bishops, clergy, and sometimes laity. Ecumenical councils, such as the first seven ecumenical councils recognized by Eastern Orthodoxy, hold a special place in theological and doctrinal matters.
Lay Involvement
While ultimate decision-making authority rests with the bishops and clergy, laypeople play an important role in the life of the Church. Lay councils and assemblies may provide input and advice on various issues. However, theological and doctrinal matters are primarily the purview of the clergy and hierarchy.
Papal Primacy and the Role of the Bishop of Rome
Eastern Orthodoxy does not recognize the Pope of Rome as having universal jurisdiction or infallibility in matters of faith and morals, as is taught by the Roman Catholic Church. Instead, the Bishop of Rome (Pope) is seen as one among equals, and his authority is limited to his own diocese.
Liturgical and Canonical Tradition
Authority in the Orthodox Church is deeply rooted in its liturgical and canonical traditions. Liturgy, prayer, and the canons of the Church provide the framework for the life and governance of the Church.
Holy Tradition
Eastern Orthodoxy places a strong emphasis on Holy Tradition, which encompasses the teachings of the apostles, the writings of the Church Fathers, the decisions of ecumenical councils, and the lived experience of the Church. Holy Tradition guides and informs the Church’s theology and practices.
In summary, authority in the Eastern Orthodox Churches is characterized by a hierarchical structure with bishops as the central figures, a commitment to conciliar decision-making, an emphasis on tradition and liturgy, and a recognition of the importance of synods and councils. The authority of the Church is seen as rooted in its apostolic succession and the preservation of Orthodox faith and practice through the centuries.
Read more: The Orthodox councils
Shop tips
Decision-making in the early ecumenical councils on Amazon
